Voice and video conversations are now essential for both personal and business communications in the constantly connected contemporary world. The ease of communication offered by instant messaging services like Telegram, WhatsApp, and Imo, among others, is a true boon for the majority of us. Even while on vacation on a tropical island, we may easily stay in touch with family members who live in other cities or continents, share significant daily events with pals, and participate remotely in crucial meetings and job interviews. The issue is that our communication depends on networks that aren’t always as dependable and quick as we’d want them to be.
Imagine yourself in the middle of a crucial discussion, whether it an Audio or video chat to go over the finer points of a new contract with your business partner or a video call to join virtually in a birthday meal with distant relatives. You’re left wondering what went wrong as the audio becomes choppy and the screen abruptly stops. The moment is spoiled in both situations.
Network performance’s influence on efficient communication
Poor mobile network coverage in remote locations, busy networks in densely populated regions (e.g., stadiums for concerts or major sporting events), erratic signal quality when driving, and sluggish Wi-Fi may all contribute to unreliable network performance and poor connection experiences.
The unfavorable result of Audio communication is robotic voices, mispronounced phrases, and latency that lengthens reaction times and produces uncomfortable pauses. While silence during in-person talks might facilitate a smooth flow, it usually causes discomfort during audio calls. Research indicates that improperly timed replies might convey hesitancy and imply a lack of comprehension or focus on the part of the listener.
The presence of video makes the problems with slow network speed much more apparent. Video calls may be unpleasant due to poor quality, distorted visuals, fuzzy faces, stuttering, and frozen frames. Researchers have shown that as video quality deteriorates, individuals prefer to speak louder and use more gestures to compensate for the reduced clarity.
These interruptions have significant repercussions and are by no means just minor annoyances. Think for a minute about how relationships might be strained by the disruptions and delays brought on by an unsteady network. In addition to running the danger of missing important life events, not being able to have a normal conversation might leave you feeling distant and angry. Call quality problems may impede workflow and cooperation in a professional context, leading to miscommunication, missed deadlines, and lower productivity.
While all instant messaging programs are magical, some are more impressive than others.
While it would be fantastic if network irregularities could just go away, this is not going to happen anytime soon. Fortunately, state-of-the-art instant messaging applications are stepping up to the plate to address network issues and provide flawless Audio and video communication experiences. Instant messaging programs make an effort to reduceAudio and video disturbances by using technologies such as adaptive bitrate streaming, which modifies video quality based on available bandwidth, packet loss concealment, which fills in missing data packets, and more. Some of these programs, nevertheless, work much better than others.
As audio calls via instant messaging applications are perhaps the most practical and affordable method to remain in contact with friends and family who are living overseas, let’s start by talking about audio quality. Test findings show that when it comes to audio quality, the well-known instant messaging software imo routinely outperforms Meta’s WhatsApp. In particular, imo’s end-to-end latency is 460 ms, whereas WhatsApp’s is 514 ms. Additionally, imo has a better Mean Opinion Score (MOS) and more consistent audio quality.
As the above data illustrates, imho voice calls provide a better, more reliable, and higher-quality audio experience in erratic handheld voice conversations.
IMO promises a more seamless video call experience than WhatsApp. This is because imho performs better at the same resolution because to its higher frame rate (15.33 fps vs. 12.67 fps) and much reduced stuttering rate (0.23% vs. 6%). In addition, it’s important to note that Telegram only offers 1080p video resolution and WhatsApp only allows 720p, but Imo supports 2K video resolution on iPhone 11 and later models and 1080p on iPhone X and older models.
Additionally, imo performs better in weak networks and successfully resolves connection issues than WhatsApp because to its stronger weak network resilience. Specifically, imo’s speed restriction threshold is 70 kbps (as opposed to WhatsApp’s 100 kbps), its packet loss limit is 60% (as opposed to WhatsApp’s 25%), and its latency limit is 1500 ms (as opposed to WhatsApp’s 800 ms). As a result, imo outperforms WhatsApp across a range of conditions with no loss, speed restrictions, packet loss, and jitter.
When you include in other app features that improve the quality of voice and video calls, you can see why an instant messaging app may have a significant impact. For example, imo uses cutting-edge technologies like “Light,” which significantly enhances picture quality in poorly light areas, and “Zero Noise,” which filters out undesirable noise from audio and video chats, to elevate every call experience.
Because there are so many instant messaging applications accessible, connection performance need to be the main focus. Users may fully enjoy the benefits of contemporary communication platforms by choosing applications like imo that emphasize call quality and can offer steady Audio and video conversations under a variety of, even challenging, network circumstances.
Changing from an audio to video call only requires one tap with your Pixel
